No he didn’t, Libby. His written remarks referred to Greenland as a “piece of ice” because that’s what it is.
— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) January 21, 2026
You’re the only one mixing anything up here. https://t.co/awRQO3eN3Y pic.twitter.com/pkAQysW06h
Trump did not refer to Greenland as a "piece of ice." At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, he referred to Iceland as a "piece of ice."
But the problem with NATO is that we’ll be there for them 100 percent. But I’m not sure that they’d be there for us if we gave them the call, “Gentlemen, we are being attacked, we’re under attack by such and such a nation.” I know them all very well. I’m not sure that they’d be there. I know we’d be there for them. I don’t know that they’d be there for us. So with all of the money we expend, with all of the blood, sweat and tears, I don’t know that they’d be there for us. They’re not there for us on Iceland, I can tell you.
In those two paragraphs, the President referred to Iceland, not once but twice, and not at all to Greenland. He stated "now what I'm asking for is a piece of ice, cold and poorly located" and "they're not there fo rus on Iceland, I can tell you."
Given the immediate context and that of the past couple of weeks, Donald clearly was referring to Greenland. Leavitt protests that he was referring to Iceland because, well, "ice" and "Iceland." If Trump were the jokester Leavitt and others have claimed he is when he says something absurd and is called out for it, he could have referred to the similarity between the two words.
If Trump had invoked the nation of Iceland for some sort of reason, it would be very troublesome. Iceland? Really? However, contrary to Leavitt's assertion, the President mixed up Greenland and Iceland.
Now, just imagine if President Joe Biden had made a similar error. Biden was forced to renounce a bid for re-election when a victory in November seemed highly unlikely because he was widely viewed as a feeble old man.
Imagine if President Biden had gone before roughly 1,000 world business and political elites and complained about a "rigged" election of five years earlier; referred to the Federal Reserve Chairman as Jerome "Too Late" Powell, as Trump did; or then-Representative Kevin McCarthy as a "fake congressperson, the description Trump gave Ilhan Omar; or a former President as "warmongering Ronald Reagan," comparable to Trump's "Sleepy Joe Biden." Or if President Biden had said that he would be bringing drug prices down by 90 percent or "you could say 1,000 percent, 2,000 percent," which would mean the pharmacist might pay you for the prescription he filled.
The Republican Party in near-unison would demand that Biden resign and the media would follow by interviewing countless Republicans with that same message.Video of the Democratic president making those outlandish statements would run in a continuous loop.
Yet Democrats are silent as they are faced with a Republican president who alternatively appears crazy, ignorant, or plainly vile or suffering from dementia, aphasia, or another physical ailment. Donald Trump is suffering from a major physical, mental, or psychological ailment and Democrats don't want to press the point. We still don't know why President Trump suddenly went to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in November 2019 or whether he was hit by even a bullet fragment in Butler, Pennsylvania in July, 2025.
A scandal usually does not materialize on its own without help from partisans who would beneift from it. Something is wrong with the man and Democrats should settle on a message to get it out to the public. Depending on a blogger or two to do it for them won't cut it.
No comments:
Post a Comment