Showing posts with label Bill Bellichick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Bellichick. Show all posts

Monday, August 26, 2019

Really, Not So Bad



And at $21,500,000, Falcon Matt Ryan will receive less this year than seven other NFL quarterbacks, including the salary leader, Russell Wilson of the Seattle Seahawks, who will pull down $71,000,000, and the Patriots' Tom Brady (who, paired with head coach Bill Bellichick, will earn $23,000,000). Quarterbacks of the Pittsburgh Steelers, New Orleans Saints, Minnesota Vikings, and Arizona Cardinals, and Jacksonville Jaguars also will make more than will Ryan. One quarterback will be paid less than him, but more than the $20,000,000 cited. (The quarterback who has played the position better than anyone ever- see below- comes in at a relatively paltry $15,000,000.)

Owning an NFL team is not only a lucrative investment, but a safe investment, owing to its socialistic practice of revenue sharing, which provides the vast majority of revenue for the teams. In 2017, the 32 teams thereby (a little more from other sources) gained approximately $250 million each, and their profit is not declining.

Seen in that context, it's slightly discouraging to read of the  "$20 million fund to be made available immediately to Amazon countries to combat forest fires and to launch a long-term initiative to protect the rainforest."  So there was no joint communique, little consensus, and a relatively small investment to fight the environmental disaster in South America. Given that it was a meeting involving Donald J. Trump, that would count as a success.









Share |

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

New England PSI




By now, we all know the New England Patriots did not know the footballs were inflated.   Owner Robert Kraft says so (and the NFL better apologize because his feelings are hurt).   Head coach Bill Bellicheat says so.  Quarterback Tom Brady, who- with Peyton Manning- lobbied for the procedural change which made underinflation possible, says so. (Brady, whom many people claim is the greatest quarterback in NFL history, allegedly was so stunningly stupid he didn't realize the balls he handled on every play were soft.) Following the quarterback's news conference, CNN reported

Brady said he picked the footballs he wanted to use five hours before the game, feeling the laces and the leather but not paying attention to the inflation level. The NFL mandates balls should be 12.5-13.5 psi.

"It's not like I squeeze the football," he said. "I grip the football."

Brady said he didn't touch the balls again until the game began. The referees inspect footballs about two hours before kickoff and deliver them to "ball attendants" who take them to the sidelines, according to NFL rules. The Patriots' opponent, the Indianapolis Colts, provided their own footballs.

Brady also said he couldn't tell any difference between the balls in the first and second halves.

This is the same guy who has won three Super Bowls.  Unfortunately, even the quarterback- who would be more likely to have known what was going on than would the head coach- never would have explicitly told the equipment manager "deflate the footballs." The latter could not have but known what the star quarterback wanted, and it was his responsibility to see that he got it- with, of course, the fellow who (with his head coach) has been by far most responsible for those championships.

The quarterback smart enough to have won as many games as he has with footballs as he wanted them was smart enough to deny, deny, deny, thus sending to individuals who might be interviewed in the NFL investigation two messages: a) if you choose to deny, nothing I say when I'm questioned after the Super Bowl will contradict your denial; and b) if you dime me out, it will be your word against the guy arguably as responsible as anyone for the success of the NFL over the past 10-15 years. (Then, practically no one would believe Brady. It might not matter.)

If Tom Terrific did not realize footballs have been deflated- and even if it hasn't helped him directly- it still has aided his team- hence his record, his reputation, and his stake in being considered the greatest ever at football's most important position.   While making no conclusions- it's not his purpose- licensed professional engineer Warren Sharp of sharpfootballanalytics.com explains Licensed professional engineer, Warren Sharp of Sharp Football Analytics offers no conclusions or value judgements and does not consider intent or culpability.   But, displaying a chart comparing all NFL teams, he explains it

is apparent, the Patriots are the only outdoor NFL team the last 25 years to average 70 plays/fumble or better, and they did it from 2007-2014 (four, five year periods).  Its simply uncanny, as the statistics above similarly showed.

Averages:

Over the last 25 years, indoor teams averaged 43 plays/fumble (in all games they played that season, regardless of site, understanding that half their games would be played indoor sans-weather).

Since 2000, they improved to 46 plays/fumble.

Over the last 25 years, outdoor teams averaged 41 plays/fumble.

Since 2000, they improved to 43 plays/fumble.

The Patriots averaged 73 plays/fumble the past 5 years, almost 70% better than the 43 plays/fumble that outdoor teams averaged since 2000.

Next, lets look only at the current 5 year period:

The league average plays per fumble from 2010 thru 2014 was 50 plays/fumble.

For indoor teams, the average was 55 plays/fumble.

For outdoor teams, excluding the Patriots, the average was 46 plays/fumble (9 fewer).

The Patriots averaged 73 plays/fumble, almost 60% MORE than outdoor teams, and almost 50% MORE than the league average the past 5 years.







Since we now can clearly in the data, both near term and long term, that dome-based teams (who play at least 8 games out of the elements) have an advantage in the fumble department, we can exclude them from comparisons to the Patriots.


If we do, I can produce a chart identical to the one at the very top which looked ONLY at fumbles lost.  This one looks at ALL fumbles, whether lost or recovered.  I think the point still remains (Graph, difficult to read, includes each NFL team; Patriots at far right- MSL):







If this chart looks nearly identical, it should.  The Patriots are so “off the map” when it comes to either fumbles or only fumbles lost.  As mentioned earlier:  this is an extremely abnormal occurrence and is NOT simply random fluctuation.


You can't blame the New England Traitors owner for trying to intimidate commissioner Roger Goodell, who is "Robert Kraft's pegboy" and who as a bully himself, probably can be bullied. The direction of the league's investigation, let alone its conclusions, is still up for modification.  But the notion that New England hasn't been cheating in this manner for a significant time is borderline farcical.




Share |

Friday, June 14, 2013






Whose Interests He Serves

It was classic, brilliant Limbaugh.

Rush Limbugh on Thursday applauded the decision by owner Robert Kraft of the New England Patriots to sign quarterback Tim Tebow, late of the Denver Broncos and the New York Jets,   At first glance, the high-living,  free-wheeling talk show host merely was pandering to the cultural right, maintaining Tebow is "someone who believes in spirituality, but very competitive and works hard, and has a great attitude (and is a) first-rate person."

Avoiding reference to "religious faith" (a phrase upon which he probably would choke), Limbaugh then lauded the former Florida Gator for his "spirituality" but seamlessly slammed what is arguably the favorite whipping boy of the victimized, put-upon right: the media.   He claimed "I mean, Tebow's spirituality is the reason the media hates him.  Tebow's spirituality is the reason he's made fun of by the media.  Tebow's spirituality is the reason people are so afraid of what he might bring to a locker room."

But wasn't done.  "Kraft," Rush added, "said something else there that is true about Tebow, and it's an intangible.  He's a winner. But he's not conventional. So it's interesting. It's a heartwarming thing."

Limbaugh long has been close with the Kraft family.  Yet, he invokes the owner of the Patriots less to commend an owner he knows than to give credit to those billionaires known as NFL owners and, in a larger sense, corporate heads generally.  In Rush's telling, it's not Bill Bellichick, he of the three Super Bowl rings as a head coach (two additional as a coordinator), who signed football's best-known Christian and so defied the liberal, godless media: it's the owner.   Somehow, it's not 31 other NFL teams which passed on Tebow, but the media and everyone else who hates him because of his "spirituality."

Tebow (an exceptional, and large, athlete) may prove a valuable contribution to the perennially successful Patriot franchise, with many an observer arguing that if anyone can make him an actual professional football player, it's the fabulously successful (if unscrupulous) Bellichick.    But make no mistake about it:  Rush, as he has reminded listeners many times, knows football.  And he knows the primary reason teams passed on Tebow is that he cannot throw. Rumor has it that an ability to pass is an asset for a quarterback.

Rush's favorable references to "spirituality" is a nod to the listeners of his for whom religion is important, as well as to those who couldn't find their way to a house of worship without a GPS but are convinced all liberals are immoral, conniving atheists.  However, as their hero extols the virtue of spirituality, they might consider (hat tip to Alternet)

Young people who consider themselves “spiritual but not religious” are more likely to commit property crimes than those who identify as just “religious” or “spiritual and religious,” according to one  study from Baylor University, a Baptist institution.

Researchers surveyed participants to see how often they had committed crimes in the previous 12 months, and found that loosey-goosey spiritual types (just kidding! you’re great!) were more likely to commit vandalism, theft and burglary than religious people; the study also found that agnostics and atheists were less likely than spiritual people to commit such crimes.

“Calling oneself ‘spiritual but not religious’ turned out to more of an antisocial characteristic, unlike identifying oneself as religious,” said Baylor researcher Aaron Franzen, a doctoral candidate and study co-author.

It is a hard time to be spiritual, scientifically speaking: researchers from University College London recently  found that that this group is more prone to “anxiety disorders, phobias and neuroses” than atheists, agnostics and religious people.

That is not to suggest that Tim Tebow will be holding up a convenience store or breaking into your home.   Highly religious people such as Tebow are less likely than most people to commit a property crime than others- especially "spiritual" individuals-  possibly because

they fear "supernatural sanctions" as well as criminal punishment and feel shame about deviance, are bonded to conventional society, exercise high self control in part because of parents who also are likely to be religious, and associate with peers who reinforce their behavior and beliefs.

The researchers appear not to have reported whether the 43.8% of the subjects who consider themselves neither religious nor spiritual were likely to commit property crimes. Nonetheless, it is instructive that Limbaugh poses as a pal to the "spiritual- then  (inaccurately) characterizes Tim Tebow as exclusively, peculiarly, "spiritual," a category of persons especially prone to "anxiety disorders, phobias and neuroses."

Clearly, that would not concern a man who is unconcerned about the 11.5% who are spiritual but not religious, 6.8% who are religious but not spiritual, or the 27.9% who are both spiritual and religious, but only about the 1% who control 40% of the nation's wealth.



Share |

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Stop The (New England) Patriots!

Calling on all patriots to renounce Patriots....

Yes, it is time for all American patriots to declare their opposition to the New England Patriots. The Patriots videotaped defensive signals being sent onto the field by New York Jets coaches in a game earlier this year, a blatant violation of league rules that probably has been going on for a much longer period of time, and head coach Bill Bellichick escaped any suspension by the league.

The Patriots have started the season an impressive 4-0, and Fred Rogin, sportscaster for the NBC affiliate in Los Angeles, stated on August 4, 2007 on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that apparently the Patriots did not need those signals. But as anyone who follows the National Foootball League even marginally knows, the league is so balanced (some even call it "parity") that the smallest advantage any team gets is crucial. This cheating should throw into doubt the legitimacy of the three Super Bowls (in 2002, 2004, and 2005) recently won by New England, and all patriots must hope these guys are stopped before they win another championship.

The New Pledge of Allegiance

Last month, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez infamously stated "I have a local city councilman that has this saying 'Woke 1...