Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Go, Pierre!


President-elect Donald Trump idenfies as, and brags about being, a great dealmaker. So this how you do it.


It's a safe bet because   

Outgoing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he spoke with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump about Trump’s talk of turning the northern nation into America’s “51st state” when the two met at Mar-a-Lago in November.

“It actually sort of came up at one point,” Trudeau told MSNBC’s Jen Psaki in an interview that aired Sunday. “And then we started musing back and forth about this.”

But according to the prime minister, the exchange came to a quick halt after Trudeau jokingly made Trump an offer.

“When I started to suggest, ‘Well, maybe there could be a trade for Vermont or California for certain parts,’ he immediately decided that it was not that funny anymore, and we moved on to a different conversation,” he told Psaki.

Take Trump seriously and literally and make him an offer he must refuse. Also

Trudeau said he had to take seriously Trump’s calls for Canada to become a state. At the same time, though, he dismissed the idea as “a nonstarter.”

“That’s not going to happen,” he said. “It’s just a nonstarter. Canadians are incredibly proud of being Canadian.”

It's conceivable that the felonius President-elect doesn't understand the concept of being proud of one's country. Speaking to supporters in Miami last June, Trump maintained "we have a rigged country. We have a country that's corrupt."  Advocating return of the electric chair ("bring it back, and FAST!") on October 31, 2023,, he had tweeted (Truth Socialed?) in part "Our Country is Rigged, Crooked, and Evil." Patrotism and national pride are foreign to him.

Even if Trump fully comprehended "Canadians are incredibly proud of being Canadian," it would have meant nothing to him. However, The Art of the Deal guy was likely taken aback by Trudeau's counteroffer, that Vermont and California would instead be transferred to Canada. 

The ex-President understands completely the Ovrton Window and is accustomed to moving the goalposts. Here, his preposterous suggestion that Canada become part of the USA was met with an equally preposterous suggestion. (Let alone that California does not share a border with Canada.)

That is the way to handle the President-elect, Trudeau realizing he must "go big or go home." "I'll see you and raise you" seems to have worked on the incoming President better than anything tried by the latter's domestic critics. Democrats, terrified of uttering "President Musk" and throwing Trump off his game, should take note.




Sunday, January 12, 2025

Show Some Self-Respect



He's not even President yet, and the submitters are submitting to Donald J. Trump already. This is fitting from one of the duo which went hat in hand, sans recording machine or witness, to Mar-a-Lago to chat with President-elect Trump 

The first pilgramage for the couple to the Trump resort and residence in Palm Beach County took place in June, 2017, after which

MSNBC Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski was "bleeding badly from a face-lift" while at his Palm Beach, Fla., resort for New Year's Eve. He also described her as "low I.Q. Crazy Mika."

The president sent a pair of tweets aimed at Brzezinski and co-host Joe Scarborough, whom Trump called "Psycho Joe,"

In response, GOP senator Susan Collins of Maine tweeted in part "we don't have to get along but we must show respect and civility."

Jen Psaki, MSNBC talk show host and former press secretary to President Biden, on the same show on Friday demonstrated that she is as unserious as a pundit as she was effective in her previous role.

Whenever a Democratic pundit purports to tell us what message voters were sending and does not include "they didn't want Kamala Harris," there is smoke being blown up our rear ends.  Admittedly, fascism is not the most important issue for voters, especially when a former Biden Administration employee wants to close her eyes and do a Sergeant Schultz impersonation.





We don't know the full context of Psaki's remark, so "they're waiting for people to listen to them and actually engage with them in their communities about what they want..." may make some sense. In his previous job, Psaki was skilled, as she was expected to be, at going on and on without saying anything definitive. However, elected officials habitually communicate- by newsletter, in person, or on traditional or social media- with their constituents. It's highly unlikely that Psaki explained what "engage with them in their communities means," though it sounds a lot likely a tactic that Donald Trump assiduously avoided on his way to being elected twice.

Psaki doens't believe the public cares about fascism, and it appears she's not perturbed about it, either. Less comfortable is former chairman of the joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, who has said Trump is "fascist to the core" and "the most dangerous person to this country." Slightly less critical is retired Marine Corps general and Trump chief of staff John Kelly, who has maintained Trump "certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure."  But then Kelly, unlike Milley, hasn't been threatened with execution by the former and future President.

Civility! On Sunday, after the Special Counsel had resigned two days earlier afte completing his final report, Trump tweeted on Truth Social

Deranged Jack Smith was fired today by the DOJ. He is a disgrace to himself, his family, and his Country. After spending over $100,000 on the Witch Hunt against TRUMP, he left town empty handed!

Donald Trump plans to prosecute his political enemies. (Probation or a fine will not be an option.) Others will be threatened with worse. That should be enough to focus the mind of journalists and others. Michael Steele, a frequent contributor to Morning Joe, was too polite to run down the lady on the panel with him. However, he had enough with Scarborough:



 




Friday, January 10, 2025

Fire


And so it was that

Similar to the right’s reaction to the Trump assassination attempt, the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse and airplane malfunctions, (Scott) Jennings insinuated that diversity-hiring initiatives were behind the lack of containment of the deadly L.A. fires during Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN Newsnight.

“We have DEI, we have budget cuts, and yet I’m wondering now if your house was burning down, how much do you care what color the firefighters are?” Jennings asked, referencing a California program that aimed to change the primarily white male makeup of the state’s firefighting force.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), however, immediately pushed back on the Trump-boosting pundit’s suggestion, adding that she was “so tired” of conservatives finding a way to blame DEI.

“Because you are a woman or because — because I know that some of the right has been sharing these photos of the fact that I believe that the fire chief may be a woman or something — that has nothing to do with it,” she said. “We are looking at qualifications. What diversity, equity, and inclusion has always been about is saying, ‘You know what, open this up. Don’t just look at the White men. Open it up and recognize that other people can be qualified.’”

Crockett went on to note that if minorities are “good enough to build this country” and serve in the military, they “are good enough to serve in other ways.” She then made sure to let Jennings know that he was making his comments on a panel that was quite diverse.

“The fact is, stop trying to act as if only white men are the ones that are capable because right now, you’re sitting at a table with three very capable Black women,” she declared.

“I’m not,” he retorted. “I’m just simply saying that as a matter of public policy in California, the main interest in the fire department lately has been in DEI programming and budget cuts.”


Unsurprisingly, nothing in Representative Crockett's attack addressed Jennings' argument a California program pertained to diversity, equity, and inclusion and hampered the response to the wildfires.  Though it's hard to separate fact from fiction and the wheat from the chaff, we do know that, according to Newsweek, Los Angeles Fire Department chief Kristin

Crowley is the first woman and first openly LGBTQ+ person to hold her post. She is married to retired firefighter Hollyn Bullock.

Her nomination came after former Fire Chief Ralph Terrazas stepped down amid growing scrutiny for not doing enough to stop sexist and racist behavior within the Los Angeles Fire Department.

Trying to cover both his right and left flanks

"I look for who's best, not just who makes history,"(Mayor Eric)  Garcetti said at a press conference. "Because the protection of our city first and foremost has to go to the human being who is best prepared to lead. But, let me be clear, that is Kristin Crowley. And this progress is incredibly important and long overdue."

"Not just who makes history," sayeth the Mayor, obviously proud that he broke a glass ceiling by doing something "incredibly important and long overdue."  However, Crowley (thus Garcetti, also) should be given her due because

When she was nominated to her position in 2022, she had been with the fire department for 22 years, having been a firefighter, paramedic, engineer, fire inspector, captain, battalion chief, assistant chief, fire marshal and deputy chief. She became Los Angeles' first female fire marshal in 2016. When she took the firefighter exam in the late 1990s, she ranked among the top 50 out of 16,000 applicants.

Possessed with a strong resume, that would have made Crowley "qualified" in much the same way that Kamala Harris- former big city District Attorney, huge state Attoreny General, US Senator, Vice-President- was immensely qualified to be President. However, when she accepted the nomination, she not only said what must be said- my people will perform well-  but went beyond by stating

As the fire chief, if confirmed, I vow to take a strategic and balanced approach to ensure we meet the needs of the community we serve. We will focus our efforts on increasing our operational effectiveness, enhancing firefighter safety and well-being, and fully commit to fostering a diverse, equitable and inclusive culture within the LAFD.

Assuming Crowley was being honest, she saw her mission as twofold. She would try to be effective and increase employee safety- the traditional, conventional, and sensible aim. However, she also would "fully commit to fostering a diverse, equitable and inclusive culture within the LAFD."

She would be serving not only one, but two, masters. (Relax- it's the traditional, generic meaning of "masters.")  One would be the unavoidable and inevitable goal of improving the department; the other, equity.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion is not, has not been, and never will be synonymous with "open this up. Don't just look at the white men. Open it up and recognzi that other people can be qualified." Equity pertains to equal outcome, not equal opportunity. Applied aggressively, it can be the opposite of "open this up."

Nonetheless, DEI had nothing to do with the eruption of wildfires and little or nothing to do with the response to them.  Neither, in all likelihood, did any of the other partisan, right-wing explanations such as federal relief funds diverted to migrants; protecting Delta smelt at the expense of water made available to southern California; money appropriated for Ukraine; fire department budget cuts; and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom because they are, well, Democrats.

By contrast, in Newsweek, Leighton Woodhouse notes that beneath the asphalt of Los Angeles is not a desert but a grassland, whose natural ecosystem is fire.  Around virtually every city emerged "exurbs, and around them rural agricultural zones. Only then do you reach wild forests, mountains, or prairies. By contrast, L.A. "grew up in a hurry. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, development occured so rapidly that urban and suburban density extends unabated all the way up until it collides into wildlands." Add to this a warming climate, and the situation is ripe for such a catastrophe.

Relying on historical context, this explanation is unsexy, a threat to sacred cows, and realistic. Video and, especially, soundbites cannot tell the story. It is also a little complex and far less provocative than talk of DEI, fish, marauding immigrants, or Ukraine. Three guesses which will dominate the news cycles.



Wednesday, January 08, 2025

So Do It



In a bold, brazen, and belligerent (alliteration day!) news conference on January 7, 2025, President-elect Donald Trump boasts

We're going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, which has a beautiful ring. It covers a lot of territory. The Gulf of America- what abeautiful name. And it's apppropriate. It's appropriate. And Mexico has to stop millions of people from pouring into our country. They could stop them.

Mexico, Panama, Canada, Denmark- there may be a nearly endless supply of countries Donald Trump would consider invading in order to satisfy President Musk's insatiable desire for world domination. By contrast, stopping "millions of people from pouring into our country" is a worthy goal. And as luck would have it, we have an opportunity to curtail illegal immigration because we have a reasonably good idea who is enhancing the power of the cartels extensively involved in the business.  

The Washington Post reported on November 1 about the

human smuggling business that has exploded in recent years, enabling a record number of migrants to reach the U.S. southern border. At least 80 percent of unlawful border-crossers hire smugglers, according to a 2023 report by the Department of Homeland Security. Even as Donald Trump and Kamala Harris spar over migration, each presidential candidate pledging tougher controls on the border, smugglers are creating an ever-more-efficient pipeline to get people there.

They guide people through treacherous jungles on the trek from Colombia to Panama. They whisk migrants over remote Guatemalan border crossings and up traffic-clogged Mexican highways. With revenue estimated at $4 billion to $12 billion per year, the smuggling of migrants has joined drugs and extortion as a top income stream for groups like Mexico’s Sinaloa and Jalisco cartels, increasing their economic clout throughout the hemisphere.

Cartels are nothing without their guns and, fortunately, the United States knows where so many of them are coming from. CBS News reported in December

During one of the deadliest chapters in its history, Mexico's government devised a new strategy to curb gun violence; it filed two lawsuits .The first, in 2021, included U.S. gun manufacturer Smith & Wesson and one of their wholesalers. The second, filed a year later, against five U.S. gun stores, claimed they engaged in "reckless and unlawful business practices" that supply dangerous criminals.

An estimated 200,000 to half million U.S. firearms are smuggled into Mexico every year. Mexico asked American attorney Jonathan Lowy to help cut off the gun pipeline, known as the "iron river."

"If you think fentanyl overdoses are a problem, if you think migration across the border is a problem, if you think the spread of organized crime is a problem in the United States, then you should care about stopping the crime gun pipeline to Mexico," Lowy said. "And you need to stop it at its source. Because all those problems are driven by the supply of U.S. guns to the cartels."

Perhaps cartels could be acquiring firearms from the USA as easily- except they cannot, because

Like the U.S., Mexico's constitution grants its citizens the right to bear arms. But unlike the U.S., that right comes with a long list of restrictions.

There's also a big difference in the number of gun dealers. In the U.S., there are more than 75,000 active gun dealers, twice as many as U.S. post offices. While in Mexico, there's just one gun store. It's located in the middle of a heavily guarded military base in Mexico City.

Before customers can even enter, they must show proof they've passed psychological tests, drug screens and extensive background checks. The store sells about 1,000 guns a month, mostly shotguns, small caliber rifles and handguns.

Second Amendment fitishists may argue that gun laws cannot stop these gun sales. However, we find that, yes, the law is an ass because

It's difficult to know which gun dealers could be these so-called "bad actors" because U.S. law prohibits the ATF from publicly releasing specific gun trace information. But 60 Minutes reviewed internal ATF and Mexican law enforcement documents. According to those documents, 566 guns recovered in Mexico over a four-and-a-half-year period were traced back to the Arizona dealers named in Mexico's lawsuit. Nearly 200 of the guns came from one dealer: Ammo AZ, located near Phoenix and owned by Veerachart "Danger" Murphy.

Murphy declined to be interviewed by 60 Minutes, but after Ammo AZ was named in Mexico's suit, he posted a response online.

"If we were actually doing something illegal, ATF, FBI would have already shut us down. And I would be in jail," he said in his online post.



So aside from requiring Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms to release specific gun trace information, legislation could correct the situation in which

Under U.S. law, gunmakers have typically been shielded from liability when one of their guns is used during a crime. But Mexico is arguing the manufacturer is "aiding and abetting" gun trafficking to the cartels. Smith & Wesson called that allegation "not true." Smith & Wesson did not respond to a request for comment from 60 Minutes.

It won't be done, of course. It didn't happen when Democrats, most of whom generally support gun safety legislation, controlled the presidency and one or both houses of Contress. And it's even more of a pipe dream that Republicans would move to restrict the supply of firearms to the menally unstable, drug addicts, criminals, or cartels.  Nonetheless, it would be encouraging if Democrats were to blunt the big GOP advantage on the immigration issue by pointing out that Republicans are encouraging the very illegal immigration they seem so exorcised by. 

We "could stop millions of people from pouring into our country," says the President-elect. In twelve or so days, it will be time for the Democratic Party to redefine the issue and challenge the Republican Congress and President to do something about it.



Monday, January 06, 2025

January 6 Misconception


A co-host on The View, Sara Haines, told (at 4:24 of the video below) viewers "And I know a ton of people that are not re-writing this, who may have voted for Donald Trump, that are lifelong Republicans, who still say January 6 was a disgrace."

I hate to be the one to burst her bubble but they are blowing smoke up her posterior. Although a few well-educated, affluent Republicans- who are very likely most of Haines' GOP friends- believe the insurrection of 1/6/21 was a bad thing, most of them are blowing smoke up her posterior.



But for sheer overall wrongness, no one on the set could top Alyssa Farah Griffin, who a moment earlier (at 2:41) had commented

Most Americans were not comfortable with January 6. They thought it was bad, they thught it was awful. But for four years they said "guys, we are hurting. The cost of living is too high. We are concerned about the border. Yes, democracy matters. But if you can't pay your bills, it's hard to care about something as nebulous as democracy...

Yes, there are people who believe that democracy matters. They are called Democrats, and most Independents agree. The ninth question of a Washington Post-University of Maryland poll conducted December 14-18 of 2023 asked 

Which comes closer to your point of view: the storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021 was an attack on democracy that should never be forgotten, or too much is being made of the storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021 and it is time to move on?

The choices were Never be forgotten, Time to move on," and No opinion/skipped.

Fivety-five percent of repsondents opted for "never be forgotten," forty-three percent for "time to move on," and two percent were the remainder.

At the time this survey was taken, 27-29% of voters identified as Democrats, 25-28 percent as Republicans, and 40-45% as Independents. The vast majority of Democrats, probably around 90%, are likely to have selected "never be forgotten." No doubt many Independents did also, probably in a ratio approximating the overall results.

Then there are Republicans. Do the math, as Griffin and Haines did not. It is certain that a majority of Republicans, likely an overwhelming majority, went for "time to move on." And that does not include the Republicans (and a few Independents) who would have been reluctant to suggest to pollsters- whom many don't trust- that they oppose democracy.

Certainly, people did care about the border and the cost of living. However, not only is there relatively little a President can do about prices, the economy generally was better in the past election system than it was four years earlier, when Donald Trump was President, and better than it was when Ronald Reagan won easy re-election with "Morning in America."  Voters did hold Democrats more than Republicans to blame for the chaotic border. However, the situation improved markedly in the last several months before the election and would have quieted further had a bill crafted on a bipartisan basispassed Congress. That was the bill to which Donald Trump responded by saying roughly "no, not on Biden's watch will we allow this to improve."

Many voters do care more about the price of eggs and gas than they do about democracy. But that's just the point. Most Republicans were fine with the attempted coup, and among the small minority which thought it was "awful," democracy (or representative democracy or democratic republic) is not a value held dear.

If that wasn't naive enough, Griffin then remarked

I aay this with due respect for Joe Biden. I didn't disagree with a word he said in that op-ed. But people are saying we have concerns about your age. He waited until August and then gave Kamala Harris this runway (shows two fingers close together) to run for President. All the warning signs ere there. They had the choice to stop Donald Trump from being inaugurated, and here we are.

I don't know whether Griffin was referring to stopping Trump's inauguration, as she literally stated, or to defeating Trump at the polls, which would at least make a little sense. Three months before the election, the AP noted

Just as soon as Biden abruptly ended his candidacy, Harris and her team worked rapidly to secure backing from the 1,976 party delegates needed to clinch the nomination in a formal roll call vote. She reached that marker at warp speed, with an Associated Press survey of delegates nationwide showing she locked down the necessary commitments a mere 32 hours after Biden’s announcement.

Harris’ nomination became official after a five-day round of online balloting by Democratic National Convention delegates ended Monday night, with the party saying in a statement released just before midnight that 99% of delegates casting ballots had done so for Harris. The party had long contemplated the early virtual roll call to ensure Biden would appear on the ballot in every state. It said it would next formally certify the vote before holding a celebratory roll call at the party’s convention later this month in Chicago.

It was quick, clean, and decisive. There was little bickering and much party unity, and an enthusiastic reception for the nominee at the national convention, which was a rousing success. Kamala Harris had become the nominee with little opposition, thus not having to run the gauntlet of a primary process in which any flaws would be revealed and she would have had to answer for either her earlier positions on issues or be drawn further left. Either would have been a liability in the general election campaign, and she worked feverishly and successfully to galvanize anti-Trump Republicans. 

Kamala Harris was easily made the party's nominee. She then ran the campaign as she saw fit, one which probably would maximize her chance of being elected, stressing that so many Republicans were  in her corner and that she would govern not as a partisan Democrat and in a fashion far less chaotic than would her opponent.

It was not enough. It was insufficient because though running a good campaign, she was a very bad candidate. It was insufficient also because, whatever Griffin's friends wanted her to hear, the vast majority of Republicans (and some Independents) were satisfied with an attempted coup. It would be nice to think otherwise, that there is sweeping, bipartisan support for democracy but, as Griffin herself would put it, "and here we are."


Saturday, January 04, 2025

The Carville Prescription


In his daily poll for January 4, 2025, Philadelphia-based CNN talk show hostMixhael Smerconish asks "Do you agree with James Carville that Kamala Harris lost for one simple reason: the economy?" The question probably was written by Smerconish's producer, who is in the habit of asking unclear, ambiguous, or misleading questions.

This question, prompted by Carville's 1/4/25 op-ed in The New York Times, falls into either the second or third categories. Acknowledging error in being convinced that Kamala Harris would defeat Donald Trump, Carville remarks "We lost for one very simple reason: It was, it is, and it always will be the economy, stupid. We have to begin 2025 with that truth as our political north star and not get distracted byy anything else."

Carville may be as famous for his stock phrase "it's the economy, stupid" as he is for having been one of the two primary campaign strategists for Bill Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign, which spawned the expression.


  nbsp;


However, the advice of the Ragin' Cajun for his Democratic Party did not pertain primarily to the price of eggs or of gas. Carville, who has slammed the Party for concentrating on "woke,"argues in his op-ed

While Democrats have next to no chance of passing a bold, progressive economic agenda in the next four years, what we can do is force Republicans to oppose us. We must be on the offensive with a wildly popular and populist economic agenda they cannot be for.

Let’s start by forcing them to oppose a raise in the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Let’s make Roe v. Wade an economic messaging issue and force them to block our attempts to codify it into law. And let’s take back the immigration issue by making it an economic issue and force the G.O.P. to deny bipartisan reform that expedites entry for high-performing talent and for those who will bring business into our nation. This year the Democratic Party leadership must convene and publish a creative, popular and bold economic agenda and proactively take back our economic turf. Go big, go populist, stick to economic progress and force them to oppose what they cannot be for. In unison.

Amen and amen. Add to it consumer regulation (put into a sexier package) and raising Social Security benefits. However, Carville adds

To Democratic presidential hopefuls, your auditions for 2028 should be based on two things: 1) How authentic you are on the economy and 2) how well you deliver it on a podcast.

How authentic you are on the ecobomy? In August during the campaign, Donald Trump promised "promises will come down. You just watch. They'll come down, and they'll come down fast. Not only with insurance, with everything." Having now been elected, he says of grocery prices "It's hard to bring them down once they're up. You know, it's very hard."  Not very authentic but very effective, and the candidate was elected.

This is not an anomaly. On March 26, 1992, the "I feel your pain" was born as Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton- the most famous of Carville clients- told an AIDS activist 

I feel your pain, I feel your pain, but if you want to attack me personally, you're no better than Jerry Brown and all the rest of these people who say whatever sounds good at the moment.

It's hard to believe Bill Clinton ever felt anyone's pain except his own but voters bought it, He was elected and four years later was re-elected. "Strong and wrong beats weak and right" asserted Clinton, who understood the strategic importance of faking self-confidence.

As President, Clintom succeeded Ronald Wilson Reagan who, like the former Arkansas governor, won his re-election bid. In that latter race, in 1984, Reagan was re-elected on the theme of "It's Morning in America"-  with an economy weaker than the one Americans enjoyed in this, the last year of the Biden presidency.


               


But voters bought it. They bought it because Ronald Reagan prior to his political career was a professional actor. He didn't lose his acting skills, riding them to the California statehouse and later two elected terms as President of the USA.

Obviously, Donald J. Trump, despite his obvious unfitness for the office, has now been elected twice to the presidency. He was a bad businessman and terrible president but an excellent actor on The Apprentice. 

And so it is:two professional actors and the chaming and cunning "SlickWillie," each of them elected and re-elected. They were elected not because they were "authentic" on the economy but because they appeared authentic.

James Carville's emphasis on performing well on a podcast is interesting and at least legitimate, and the impact of social media generally is not going away. Touting the importance of economic populism also is a counter-weight to the obsession with race plaguing the Democratic Party. Nonetheless, it needs to be recognized that for authenticity in presidential elections, perception trumps reality.


Thursday, January 02, 2025

Now Do Him



Former United States Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming is seen here remarking "we must act with honor and duty and in the interests of our nation."

President Joseph R. Biden now has done so as he

announced Thursday that he is awarding the Presidential Citizens Medal to Rep. Bennie Thompson and former Rep. Liz Cheney, the two lawmakers who led the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

Mr. Biden will deliver remarks and present the awards to Thompson, Cheney and more than a dozen other recipients during a ceremony at the White House later Thursday.

"The Presidential Citizens Medal is awarded to citizens of the United States of America who have performed exemplary deeds of service for their country or their fellow citizens. President Biden believes these Americans are bonded by their common decency and commitment to serving others. The country is better because of their dedication and sacrifice," the White House said in announcing those honored.

 Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, and Cheney, a Wyoming Republican, served as chair and vice chair, respectively, of the House panel that was tasked with examining the events leading up to and on Jan. 6. In the course of its probe, the committee held 10 public hearings, interviewed more than 1,000 witnesses and compiled more than 1 million pages of material.

Its work concluded in December 2022 after an investigation that spanned 18 months. The committee voted to refer President-elect Donald Trump and conservative lawyer John Eastman for criminal prosecution because of their alleged efforts to subvert the peaceful transfer of presidential power on Jan. 6.

Congress or the President of the USA bestows twenty-four other honors. The most prestigious, however, are the Congressional Award, Congressional Gold medal, the Medal of Honor, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The latter medal is usually considered the highest civilian award available and is bestowed by the President at his or her (heretofore, his) discretion. 

Cheney and Thompson are being properly lauded for their role in investigating the insurrection of January 6, 2021. How many lives of members of Congress, therefore, was it necessary.for Lt. Michael S. Byrd to save to be honored? Ashli Babbit's violent and lawless behavior led a mob of people to gain "access to "a hallway outside 'Speaker's Lobby,' which leads to the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives." 

Thus far, his courageous decision to shoot Babbitt has brought only the invevitable death threats from Trump supporters and from the Babbitt family a wrongful death lawsuit, due to be heard in January, 202., During an interview with NBC's Lester Holt in August of that year, Byrd

discussed in detail the moments leading up to when he fired at Babbitt, telling Holt: “I tried to wait as long as I could.”

He said he “hoped and prayed” that nobody would try to enter the doors he was guarding, but their “failure to comply required” him to “take the appropriate action to save the lives of members of Congress and myself and my fellow officers.”

Byrd at one point during the riots was inside the House chamber, where a number of lawmakers were seeking cover. He told Holt that he gave one critical instruction to the members on the floor: to remove their congressional pins so they would blend in.

“One of the things that was imperative was to inform the members to remove their pins to allow them to blend in,” Byrd said. “To remove their jackets, to look like staff as much as possible.”

Byrd soon after rushed out of the chamber and, along with a few other officers, created a makeshift barricade with furniture. He said it was at that point, when “the chants got louder,” that he knew the mob was approaching.

“At that point is when I realized they’re here,” Byrd said. “The chants got louder. I couldn’t make out what they were saying, but it sounded like hundreds of people outside of that door.”



Lt. Byrd may fear for his life. For all we know, President Biden may already have offered him an award or a medal for saving the lives of many lawmakers, and perhaps saving our representative democracy on that day almost exactly four years go. If the outgoing President has not done so, he should, and couple it with a powerful statement supporting our system of government, intolerance for violent crime, and the value of human life.


The New Pledge of Allegiance

Last month, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez infamously stated "I have a local city councilman that has this saying 'Woke 1...