“People have forgotten that the president was shot in the head. Can you imagine if that shot would have gone the way Charlie Kirk’s went?” - John Fetterman
— Lucas Sanders ππ³️ππͺππΊπ§ (@LucasSa56947288) September 17, 2025
π€¨
pic.twitter.com/r9TUJGvAgW
Investigators searching Thomas Matthew Crooks’ devices have also found that the shooter looked up the dates for the Democratic National Convention as well as Trump’s appearances, according to the people who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition on anonymity to discuss details of the ongoing probe.
Crooks was not dead-set (no pun intended, really) on killing Donald Trump. There were other targets- Democratic targets- he had in mind. The motive(s) of an individual planning to murder several persons or one of any group of people differs from someone intent on killing one specific individual.
But it's consequential for another reason. Fetterman argues "and can you imagine if that shot would have gone the way Charlie Kirk's went? And what kind of condition our nation would be in?"
One need not be a mind reader to know that the Senator was horrified of the possibility that a President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Armed Services (when the latter called into service) would be assassinated and leave the nation leaderless. However, that would not have happened; Joe Biden was, and would have continued to be, President until the following January 20.
That's not to suggest that a successful attack upon candidate Trump would have been less serious or significant than a successful attack upon a President. If a President is assassinated, the 25th Amendment is invoked. The Vice President (who is of the same political party as the president and was chosen by him) becomes President and after a period of mourning, life goes on. Assassination of the presidential nominee of one of the two major political parties, of an individual with roughly a 50% chance of being elected President, goes to the heart of our democratic republic. It eliminates the major challenger to the incumbent Party and can dramatically change the course of the nation.
Either scenario is tragic and potentially devastating. However, there is a difference and a United States Senator, the victim of a stroke, either a) forgot that Donald Trump wasn't yet President; b) thinks thee is no difference between a presidential candidate and a President; or c)intentionally spoke of Donald as a President who suffered an assassination attempt.
That's a consequential error or something worse. The Senator is either mentally impaired (a); ignorant of our constitutional system (b); or (c) is beguiled by Donald Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment