Conduit

Someone who frequently tweets from the perspective of a transgendered, moderate Democrat married to a man is properly concerned. But about the wrong individual.

I have very real fears that the Democratic Party has nominated a candidate who is a danger to the national security of the United States.

Here are the objective facts. Abdul El-Sayed is closely connected, through his family, donors and political network, to senior figures at… pic.twitter.com/cn79pWvMXK

— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) August 20, 2026

El-Sayed, who appears to have a 50-50 chance of defeating Mike Rogers to fill the seat of retiring senator Gary Peters, is highly-educated, accomplished, and charismatic, articulate. He is a nimble campaigner and ally of the anti-Jewish, anti-American Hasan Piker.  However, if elected, el-Sayed will be only one of 100 senators, the upper chamber of a branch of government which has been increasingly emasculated the past few decades. On the other hand:

#BREAKING: Jen Psaki pressed Maggie Haberman on the Natalie Harp bombshell: Harp reportedly serves as a conduit for outsiders to get information directly to Trump, feeding him unvetted material in the way he prefers, while sitting in Oval Office meetings and remaining one of his… pic.twitter.com/4AJ566bfli

— Emoluments Clause (@Emolclause) August 20, 2026

Haberman explains that Harp

is a conduit for other people to reach him as an outside source of information on vetting information, which is really the way he likes things. He does not like the processes of government and there is a question about, you know, her own background and her service in government. If she were not sitting in the Oval Office for so many different meetings, if she were not somebody who put pieces of information in front of the President, this wouldn't be especially interesting. 

But the fact that his colleagues are among the people who have had concerns about her, not just the Secret Service. not just during the campaign, that has come up over and over again. And while I understand that the White House is upset about some of the reporting around this, you know, this is an issue they should be asking themselves as opposed to suggesting that it is inappropropriate tha reporters are writing about somebody who is one of the top advisers to the President.

The old question was: Donald Trump- sex or no sex with Harp?  The new question should be: is Natalie Harp compromised and if so, by whom?

Share |