When the images of earth cling too tightly to memory, when the call of happiness becomes too insistent, it happens that melancholy rises in man's heart: this is the rock's victory, this is the rock itself. The boundless grief is too heavy to bear. These are our nights of Gethsemane.
-Le Mythe de Sisyphe
Albert Camus, 1942
And so it was on November 4, 2013. Today, of course, there will be nothing approximating the crucifixion unless Barack Obama, still as president the head of the Democratic Party, declares a "shellacking" as he did on November 3, 2010. He thereby signaled to Republicans to claim a mandate, encouraging them to have their way with him and his party.
Speaking to Chris Matthews last night, the Huffington Post's Howard Fineman remarked, foolishly and meaninglessly, "The Dems have to reinvent themselves all over again. The Obama era is over." Prior to that, however, he more soberly had noted "Republicans are feeling feisty right now, because Mitch McConnell's strategy of basically locking up action in Washington and then blaming it on the president has worked brilliantly and I mean, that's the story." (And there is this: in the photo below- of Brownback, McConnell, and Ernst, from AP/Orlin Wagner/Jeff Malet/Justin Heyworth, montage by Salon- Mitch McConnell is the relative moderate.)
A Democrat probably- probably- will win the White House in 2016. With 10 Democratic seats and 25 Republican seats up then, Democrats will surely reduce, and possibly eliminate, the GOP majority in the Senate. (Thirty-five races are more than usual. Three seats, one won by a Democrat and two by Republicans, were decided in a special election yesterday and will be contested in 2016.) In the meantime, however, much mischief (and far worse) can be accomplished, with Chris Hayes on Monday explaining a GOP Senate would
have two key pieces of leverage the night (sic) time they want to go after programs they don`t like and cut them.
One, they will be able to pass spending bills with a simple majority through a process known as reconciliation, and that is important because it means they don`t have to meet the 60-vote filibuster threshold. They just need a simple majority.
And number two, they will be able to control the amendment process which sounds on secure and boring but is actually the most powerful thing you can do in the United States Senate, because they can add whatever they please to a spending bill and send it right to the president`s desk, and the president will then be presented with a choice, veto a bill chock-full of GOP amendments and thereby risk a big messy government shutdown that hurts millions of people, many of the people that are his supporters and constituents, or sign a bill chock full of GOP amendments and do damage to hisagenda and lots of struggling Americans who are counting on him.
And this isn`t just my pet theory of how this play out. Mitch McDonnell made an explicit promise to do exactly, precisely what I`m describing, if Republicans get a Senate majority tomorrow, telling "Politico" over the summer, Obama, quote, "Needs to be challenged and the best way to do that is threw a funding process. He would have to make a decision on a given bill whether there`s more in it that he likes than dislikes." A good example, McConnell said, is adding restrictions to regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency.
Let me be clear for a second, the regulation the EPA is issuing right now for coal-fired power plants is basically the most important thing the government is doing right now. The biggest part of the Obama domestic policy legacy since he was reelected and those regulations are set to reduce emissions and more importantly could permanently alter the trajectory of American power generation towards renewables and away from coal and the carbon pollution that is threatening mass catastrophe and all civilized life.
The best possible scenario is that Republicans ride out the next two years. But they have no incentive to do that, especially because they don't want Hillary Clinton or another Democrat running against a "do-nothing Congress. Further, their inferences that gridlock is Obama's fault will be a little harder for the mainstream media to swallow.) Salon's Simon Maloy summarizes
Bottom line: Republicans were just rewarded, and quite handsomely, for doing little beyond saying “no” to President Obama. They shut down the government last year and paid no noticeable price for it. The voters who handed the Republicans the Senate didn’t send them there to compromise with Obama or cut deals with him. The Republican “mandate,” such as it exists, is to be anti-Obama, and seeing as that’s worked out for them pretty well, there’s no reason to think they’ll switch it up anytime soon.